2023 Masters in Trial: A Trial Demonstration from Opening Statement through Jury Deliberations Out of Stock
Product Details
Scope and
Purpose
The American Board of Trial Advocates, an organization with more than 7,500 of the best trial lawyers in America, is dedicated to the preservation of the right to trial by jury guaranteed by the 7th Amendment.
Educating lawyers in the art of trial advocacy is a primary goal of the Foundation of the American Board of Trial Advocates. The Masters in Trial™ shows how some of the most successful trial lawyers in the country conduct a trial — without war stories. All of the trial team counsel are ABOTA members and are well-known and highly respected in their fields.
Case
The fact
pattern for this year’s Masters in Trial is based on an early-morning fatal
tractor-trailer accident case. The
Plaintiff, Natasha Rostova, alleges that her husband, Nicolas Rostova’s, death
was proximately caused by the negligence, gross negligence, or recklessness of
the driver and agent of Carolina Beverage Distributors, LLC. Carolina Beverage Distributors, LLC asserts
Mr. Rostova’s unfortunate passing was due to his own comparative negligence.
Whether you are
a novice or seasoned trial lawyer, plaintiff or defense counsel, this program
will assist you in your next trial. This seminar is designed to teach by
example. The skills you see demonstrated are applicable to virtually every
other civil case.
This is one seminar trial lawyers will be talking about. You don’t want to miss it. Come see how the Masters’ do it.
Seminar
Agenda
Welcome and
Overview
Plaintiff’s
Opening Statement
Defense
Opening Statement
Direct
Examination of Plaintiff Witness 1
Cross
Examination of Plaintiff Witness 1
Direct
Examination of Plaintiff Witness 2
Cross
Examination of Plaintiff Witness 2
Direct
Examination of Plaintiff’s Expert
Cross
Examination of Plaintiff’s Expert
Panel
Discussion on Strategy and Technique
Direct
Examination of Defense Witness 1
Cross
Examination of Defense Witness 1
Direct
Examination of Defense Witness 2
Cross
Examination of Defense Witness 2
Direct
Examination of Defense Expert
Cross
Examination of Defense Expert
Plaintiff’s
Closing
Defendant’s
Closing
Jury Charge
Jury
Deliberations
Jury
Verdict, Questions, and Final Thoughts
Adjourn
Course
Planners:
Elizabeth M. (Beth) McMillan- - Nelson Mullins, Greenville SC
Geoffrey W. (Geoff) Gibbon - Fayssoux & Landis Attorneys at Law, P.A., Greenville, SC
Presiding Judge: The Honorable G. D. “Doc” Morgan, Jr. - S.C. Circuit Court, Greenville SC
Plaintiff
Team:
Robert L.
(Robb) Brown - Solomon Law Group, Columbia, SC
J. Andrew
Delaney - Williams & Williams, Columbia, SC
Celeste T.
Jones - Burr Forman, Columbia, SC
Roy R. (Rob)
Kelly, IV - Kelly & Kelly, LLP, Savannah, GA
Wes A. Kissinger - KD Trial Lawyers, Spartanburg, SC
Defense Team:
Brett H. Bayne
- McAngus, Goudelock, & Courie, LLC, Columbia, SC
Kay G. Crowe - Barnes,
Alford, Stork & Johnson, LLP, Columbia, SC
Andrea La’Verne
Edney - Butler Snow, Jackson, MS
E. Dale Lang,
Jr. - Levi Law Group, Columbia, SC
Richard H. (Dick) Willis - Williams Mullen, Columbia, SC
Mandatory MCLE
Credit Hours
This seminar qualifies for 6.75 MCLE credit hours, including up to 6.75 Trial Advocacy and 6.75 Civil/Criminal credit hours.
This seminar is an Intermediate level program.
Note: When submitting your compliance reports to the SC Commission on CLE and Specialization, if you completed this in 2023, please use this course code: 239133ADO.
Tags
The South Carolina Bar is an accredited CLE provider in South Carolina only. Attorneys are responsible for seeking their own credit in other jurisdictions.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in CLE programs and publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the South Carolina Bar, its sections, or committees. The South Carolina Bar believes that all Bar members have the right to both meaningful learning and to the exchange of ideas in a civil environment. The Bar reserves the right to remove or exclude any person from a Bar event if that person is causing inappropriate disturbance, behaving in a manner inconsistent with accepted standards of decorum, or in any way preventing fellow Bar members from meaningful participation and learning.